Ecological effects of alternative fuel-reduction treatments: highlights of the National Fire and Fire Surrogate study (FFS) Public Deposited

http://ir.library.oregonstate.edu/concern/defaults/7s75dd04w

To the best of our knowledge, one or more authors of this paper were federal employees when contributing to this work. This is the publisher’s final pdf. The published article is copyrighted by CSIRO Publishing and can be found at:  http://www.publish.csiro.au/.

Descriptions

Attribute NameValues
Creator
Abstract or Summary
  • The 12-site National Fire and Fire Surrogate study (FFS) was a multivariate experiment that evaluated ecological consequences of alternative fuel-reduction treatments in seasonally dry forests of the US. Each site was a replicated experiment with a common design that compared an un-manipulated control, prescribed fire, mechanical and mechanical + fire treatments. Variables within the vegetation, fuelbed, forest floor and soil, bark beetles, tree diseases and wildlife were measured in 10-ha stands, and ecological response was compared among treatments at the site level, and across sites, to better understand the influence of differential site conditions. For most sites, treated stands were predicted to be more resilient to wildfire if it occurred shortly after treatment, but for most ecological variables, short-term response to treatments was subtle and transient. Strong site-specificity was observed in the response of most ecosystem variables, suggesting that practitioners employ adaptive management at the local scale. Because ecosystem components were tightly linked, adaptive management would need to include monitoring of a carefully chosen set of key variables. Mechanical treatments did not serve as surrogates for fire for most variables, suggesting that fire be maintained whenever possible. Restoration to pre-settlement conditions will require repeated treatments over time, with eastern forests requiring more frequent applications.
Resource Type
DOI
Date Available
Date Issued
Citation
  • McIver, J. D., Stephens, S. L., Agee, J. K., Barbour, J., Boerner, R. E. J., Edminster, C. B., & Erickson, K. L. (2012, October 31). Ecological effects of alternative fuel-reduction treatments: highlights of the National Fire and Fire Surrogate study (FFS). International Journal of Wildland Fire, 22(1), 63-82. doi:10.1071/WF11130
Academic Affiliation
Series
Keyword
Rights Statement
Funding Statement (additional comments about funding)
Publisher
Peer Reviewed
Language
Replaces
Additional Information
  • description.provenance : Made available in DSpace on 2013-03-11T21:38:13Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 McIverJamesDForestEcosystemsSocietyEcologicalEffectsAlternative.pdf: 554585 bytes, checksum: e1275a90d6b688d5783ed7928e96de67 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2012-10-31
  • description.provenance : Approved for entry into archive by Deborah Campbell(deborah.campbell@oregonstate.edu) on 2013-03-11T21:38:13Z (GMT) No. of bitstreams: 1 McIverJamesDForestEcosystemsSocietyEcologicalEffectsAlternative.pdf: 554585 bytes, checksum: e1275a90d6b688d5783ed7928e96de67 (MD5)
  • description.provenance : Submitted by Deborah Campbell (deborah.campbell@oregonstate.edu) on 2013-03-11T20:06:57Z No. of bitstreams: 1 McIverJamesDForestEcosystemsSocietyEcologicalEffectsAlternative.pdf: 554585 bytes, checksum: e1275a90d6b688d5783ed7928e96de67 (MD5)

Relationships

Parents:

This work has no parents.

Last modified

Downloadable Content

Download PDF

Items