Other Scholarly Content
 

Conceptual learning gains for face-to-face and asynchronous online course modalities in introduction to materials science

Público Deposited

Contenido Descargable

Descargar PDF
https://ir.library.oregonstate.edu/concern/defaults/hq37vx667

Descriptions

Attribute NameValues
Creator
Abstract
  • Different educational modalities can affect students in learning challenging engineering concepts. Studies that specifically measure students’ conceptual learning gains have been conducted in face-to-face (F2F) and online modalities, but few direct comparisons have been reported. In this study, we collected data from undergraduate students enrolled in introductory materials science courses in a F2F modality (N = 90) and asynchronous online modality (N = 77). Normalized learning gains were reported using a test instrument that combined twenty-six materials science concept questions taken from two concept inventories. Students completed the test at the beginning and end of each course. The average conceptual gain for the F2F modality was found to be higher than the online modality. Statistical analysis revealed a significant difference in the average gains, with a medium effect size. Multiple factors that might lead to this difference in conceptual learning are proposed. The findings in this study can serve as guidance for further educational research and instructional design, focusing on improving students’ conceptual learning for both modalities, especially for the asynchronous online learning environment.
License
Resource Type
Fecha de Emisión
Citation
  • Nigon, N., Simionescu, D., Ekstedt, T.W., Koretsky, M.D., & Tucker, J.D. (2024). Conceptual learning gains for face-to-face and asynchronous online course modalities in introductory to materials science. [White Paper]. Oregon State University Ecampus Research Unit.
Non-Academic Affiliation
Declaración de derechos
Publisher
Language
File Format

Relaciones

Parents:

This work has no parents.

En Collection:

Elementos