Empirical assessment of uncertainties of meteorological parameters and turbulent fluxes in the AmeriFlux network Public Deposited

http://ir.library.oregonstate.edu/concern/defaults/s4655h04f

This is the publisher’s final pdf. The published article is copyrighted by the American Geophysical Union and can be found at:  http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1002/%28ISSN%292169-8961.

Descriptions

Attribute NameValues
Creator
Abstract or Summary
  • Terrestrial ecosystem-atmosphere exchange of carbon, water vapor, and energy has been measured for over a decade at many sites globally. To minimize measurement and analysis errors, quality assurance data have been collected over short periods along-side tower instruments at AmeriFlux research sites. Theoretical and empirical error and uncertainty values have been reported for various aspects of the eddy covariance technique but until recently it has not been possible to constrain network level variation based on direct comparison of side-by-side measurements. Paired observations, although rare in practice, offer a possibility to obtain real-world error estimates for flux observations and corresponding uncertainties. In this study, we report the relative instrumental errors from the AmeriFlux quality assurance and quality control (QA/QC) site intercomparisons of 84 site visits (2002–2012). Relative errors, including random and systematic instrumental errors, are presented for meteorological and radiation variables, gas concentrations, and the turbulent fluxes. The lowest relative errors (<2%) were found for the meteorological parameters, while the largest relative errors were found for latent heat and CO₂ fluxes. The mean relative instrumental error for CO₂ flux averaged −8.2% (underestimation by the tower instruments). Sensible and latent heat fluxes exhibited mean errors of −1.7% and −5.2%, respectively. Deviation around the mean was also largest for the turbulent fluxes, approaching 20%. Because the data collected during QA/QC site visits are used to identify and correct errors, our results represent a conservative estimate of instrumental errors in the AmeriFlux database. Overall, the presented results confirm the high quality of the network data and underline its status as a valuable data source for the research community.
Resource Type
DOI
Date Available
Date Issued
Citation
  • Schmidt, A., C. Hanson, W. S. Chan, and B. E. Law (2012), Empirical assessment of uncertainties of meteorological parameters and turbulent fluxes in the AmeriFlux network, Journal of Geophysical Research, 117, G04014, doi:10.1029/2012JG002100.
Academic Affiliation
Series
Keyword
Rights Statement
Funding Statement (additional comments about funding)
Publisher
Peer Reviewed
Language
Replaces
Additional Information
  • description.provenance : Made available in DSpace on 2013-01-11T23:02:10Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 SchmidtAndresForestryEmpiricalAssessmentUncertainties.pdf: 1035407 bytes, checksum: 4d1624733fceb6a8c1a72aeac2b1edec (MD5) Previous issue date: 2012-12-14
  • description.provenance : Submitted by Deanne Bruner (deanne.bruner@oregonstate.edu) on 2013-01-11T20:47:53Z No. of bitstreams: 1 SchmidtAndresForestryEmpiricalAssessmentUncertainties.pdf: 1035407 bytes, checksum: 4d1624733fceb6a8c1a72aeac2b1edec (MD5)
  • description.provenance : Approved for entry into archive by Deanne Bruner(deanne.bruner@oregonstate.edu) on 2013-01-11T23:02:10Z (GMT) No. of bitstreams: 1 SchmidtAndresForestryEmpiricalAssessmentUncertainties.pdf: 1035407 bytes, checksum: 4d1624733fceb6a8c1a72aeac2b1edec (MD5)

Relationships

Parents:

This work has no parents.

Last modified

Downloadable Content

Download PDF

Items