Article
 

Can fuel-reduction treatments really increase forest carbon storage in the western US by reducing future fire emissions?

Public Deposited

Downloadable Content

Download PDF
https://ir.library.oregonstate.edu/concern/articles/vd66w041v

Descriptions

Attribute NameValues
Creator
Abstract
  • It has been suggested that thinning trees and other fuel-reduction practices aimed at reducing the probability of high-severity forest fire are consistent with efforts to keep carbon (C) sequestered in terrestrial pools, and that such practices should therefore be rewarded rather than penalized in C-accounting schemes. By evaluating how fuel treatments, wildfire, and their interactions affect forest C stocks across a wide range of spatial and temporal scales, we conclude that this is extremely unlikely. Our review reveals high C losses associated with fuel treatment, only modest differences in the combustive losses associated with high-severity fire and the low-severity fire that fuel treatment is meant to encourage, and a low likelihood that treated forests will be exposed to fire. Although fuel-reduction treatments may be necessary to restore historical functionality to fire- suppressed ecosystems, we found little credible evidence that such efforts have the added benefit of increasing terrestrial C stocks.
Resource Type
DOI
Date Available
Date Issued
Citation
  • John L Campbell, Mark E Harmon, and Stephen R Mitchell. 2011. Can fuel-reduction treatments really increase forest carbon storage in the western US by reducing future fire emissions? Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment (e-View) doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1890/110057
Journal Title
Journal Volume
  • 10
Journal Issue/Number
  • 2
Academic Affiliation
Rights Statement
Funding Statement (additional comments about funding)
  • This work was funded, in part, by the US Forest Service, Western Wildland Environmental Threat Assessment.
Publisher
Peer Reviewed
Language
Replaces

Relationships

Parents:

This work has no parents.

Items