Principles and practices in online writing instruction Public Deposited

http://ir.library.oregonstate.edu/concern/graduate_thesis_or_dissertations/rv042x505

Descriptions

Attribute NameValues
Creator
Abstract or Summary
  • This thesis explores the administrative issues that factor into the teaching of writing online. I explore these issues by situating the Conference on College Composition and Communication Position Statement of Principles and Example Effective Best Practices for Online Writing Instruction at the center of this project by both examining and critiquing it as a resource. Through a case study of the way in which Oregon State develops and delivers online writing courses, I fully explore the contents of this Position Statement to its boundaries and illustrate how other institutions can identify their own model of instruction in order to use the Position Statement as a critical lens. Also in this exploration, I identify and articulate the limitations of the Position Statement based upon its minimal treatment of the issues of instructional design, technological literacy and access, administrative complexity, and the situation of writing programs within institutional settings. I address these shortcomings of the current Position Statement in order to advance the field of composition studies by demonstrating the opportunities available to the CCCC Committee for Effective Practices in Online Writing Instruction to revisit these areas and revise the document when the time has come to do so.
Resource Type
Date Available
Date Copyright
Date Issued
Degree Level
Degree Name
Degree Field
Degree Grantor
Commencement Year
Advisor
Committee Member
Academic Affiliation
Non-Academic Affiliation
Keyword
Subject
Rights Statement
Peer Reviewed
Language
Replaces
Additional Information
  • description.provenance : Approved for entry into archive by Julie Kurtz(julie.kurtz@oregonstate.edu) on 2014-05-27T16:59:20Z (GMT) No. of bitstreams: 1 ColeGailM2014.pdf: 1024529 bytes, checksum: 7264af9da29d351715bc950ecd38ad2b (MD5)
  • description.provenance : Approved for entry into archive by Laura Wilson(laura.wilson@oregonstate.edu) on 2014-05-28T17:48:43Z (GMT) No. of bitstreams: 1 ColeGailM2014.pdf: 1024529 bytes, checksum: 7264af9da29d351715bc950ecd38ad2b (MD5)
  • description.provenance : Made available in DSpace on 2014-05-28T17:48:43Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ColeGailM2014.pdf: 1024529 bytes, checksum: 7264af9da29d351715bc950ecd38ad2b (MD5) Previous issue date: 2014-05-12
  • description.provenance : Submitted by Gail Cole (coleg@onid.orst.edu) on 2014-05-21T23:20:43Z No. of bitstreams: 1 ColeGailM2014.pdf: 1024529 bytes, checksum: 7264af9da29d351715bc950ecd38ad2b (MD5)

Relationships

In Administrative Set:
Last modified: 08/22/2017

Downloadable Content

Download PDF
Citations:

EndNote | Zotero | Mendeley

Items