Article
 

How Rejected Recommendations Shape Recommenders' Future Product Intentions

Public Deposited

Downloadable Content

Download PDF
https://ir.library.oregonstate.edu/concern/articles/qz20t200d

Descriptions

Attribute NameValues
Creator
Abstract
  • When a consumer (a recommender) recommends a product to another consumer (a recommendee), it is not uncommon to learn whether the recommendee chose the recommended option (i.e., accepted the recommendation) or a different option (i.e., rejected the recommendation). Our research examines how rejected recommendations affect recommenders’ subsequent intentions toward the originally recommended product. We find that upon learning one’s recommendation was rejected, recommenders are less likely to repurchase or choose the product in the future. This negative effect emerges because recommenders question their knowledge about the recommended product (i.e., self-perceived expertise is reduced). Such questioning is more likely to occur when the recommendee is a close other and less likely to occur when the recommended product is perceived to primarily differ from alternatives due to subjective preferences (i.e., horizontal differentiation is salient). Importantly, this rejected recommendation effect is shown to be distinct from a social proof account. The current research contributes to WOM theory by identifying a novel outcome of recommendation interactions—rejected recommendations—and by demonstrating that this outcome can cause consumers to shift away from a product despite having felt positively enough about the product to recommend it to others
License
Resource Type
DOI
Date Issued
Journal Title
Academic Affiliation
Rights Statement
Funding Statement (additional comments about funding)
  • The authors are grateful to Darren Dahl, Meg Meloy, and Karen Winterich for their helpful comments. Financial support from the Social Sciences and the Humanities Research Council of Canada (SSHRC) and the Oregon State University College of Business is gratefully acknowledged.
Publisher
Peer Reviewed
Language
ISSN
  • 1532-7663

Relationships

Parents:

This work has no parents.

Items