Graduate Project
 

How Federal Employees Manage the Challenge of Implementing the Endangered Species Act

Pubblico Deposited

Contenuto scaricabile

Scarica il pdf
https://ir.library.oregonstate.edu/concern/graduate_projects/gb19ff038

Descriptions

Attribute NameValues
Creator
Abstract
  • The Endangered Species Act (ESA) grants legal standing for any individual or party willing to challenge a species status finding in court. As a result, the legislation has become a controversial, but powerful tool leveraged in political battles and legal disputes that go far beyond the narrow confines of conservation science. Bureaucrats in charge of implementing the ESA face unrelenting challenges about their recommendations and decisions from political conflict and criticisms of the law itself. At the same time, the list of at-risk species continues to increase. I shadowed professionals from the US Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS), the Western Division of the American Fisheries Society (AFS/WD), and the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife (WDFW) in virtual meetings. Further, I interviewed them in one-on-one conversations to better understand how ESA bureaucrats deal with the stress of ESA implementation while upholding their civil servant duties to be impartial in their decision-making. I extracted several lessons from these observations about the candid realities of how civil servants manage stressful conflicts when implementing the ESA, all the while under constant scrutiny and political pressures. These lessons include: (1) Federal and state fish and wildlife employees have difficulty compartmentalizing their personal policy and political preferences; (2) FWS staff are uncomfortable providing a finding when there is insufficient data to do a scientifically rigorous job of implementing the law; (3) Federal and state employees welcome participants to share their experiential knowledge, but its use is minimal; (4) FWS employees believe their listing recommendations should be the key policy driver and not court-ordered decisions; (5) The major long-term policy drivers of species distribution or abundance are generally outside the purview of the ESA and this greatly frustrates FWS staff; and (6) Implementation of the ESA in the decision-making process reflects societal values rather than technical science, and ESA bureaucrats are exasperated when their species determinations are not followed. Overall, ESA implementation will continue to be stressful for bureaucrats implementing the law as ongoing litigation and ecological constraints preclude species recovery.
License
Resource Type
Date Issued
Degree Level
Degree Name
Degree Field
Degree Grantor
Commencement Year
Advisor
Committee Member
Academic Affiliation
Dichiarazione dei diritti
Publisher
Peer Reviewed
Language

Le relazioni

Parents:

This work has no parents.

Elementi

Thumbnail Titolo Data caricata Visibilità Azioni
file details JacksonElizabeth2021.pdf 2022-02-28 Pubblico Scaricare